Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 00:36:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200010250436.AAA16812@mattababy.mit.edu> From: belmonte@mit.edu (Matthew Belmonte) To: john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov Subject: oppose the Gregg provision in the Commerce-Justice-State spending bill Dear Senator Kerry As your constituent, I urge you to oppose a provision of the Commerce- Justice-State spending bill that has been introduced by Senator Gregg. While touted as a way of curtailing the availability of Social Security Numbers, the provision-which Senator Gregg calls "Amy Boyer's Law" -is riddled with loopholes and exceptions for special interests which would render its privacy protections meaningless. Although named for Amy Boyer, the young victim of an Internet stalker who traced her an information broker, the measure includes at least two exceptions that would protect information brokers while doing nothing to shield future Amy Boyers. It even includes an exception permitting industry use of SSN's to create consumer profiles. In addition, by barring display of SSN's by virtually any person anywhere for any purpose, the provision runs headlong into the First Amendment's free speech protections. A better way to protect privacy would be to place restrictions on the purchase and sale of SSN's, and on government and business use of SSN's. This legislation is opposed by a wide array of privacy groups, including the Consumer Federation of America, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, the Identity Theft Resource Center, the National Consumers League, and U.S. Public Interest Research Group. I understand that this provision was written by, and for, the very industry interests that make it their business to invade privacy by constructing consumer profiles from databases linked by consumers' SSN's. I hope that you'll opposed this flawed measure, and will support future legislation that will do something meaningful to protect individual privacy.