Shifts of Visual Spatial Attention Modulate a Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential

Matthew Belmonte

Cognitive Brain Research 6(4):295-307 (April 1998)

Address for correspondence: mkb4@Cornell.edu

ABSTRACT: Although the effects of static allocations of visual spatial attention have been investigated using event-related potentials, most studies of shifts in visual spatial attention have been limited to behavioural measures. This study applied electroencephalographic measures to shifts in visual spatial attention in an effort to elucidate the time courses of such shifts. Using a custom-developed steady-state evoked potential analysis system, we analysed amplitude changes in phase-locked and non-phase-locked EEG responses to rapid, periodic visual stimulation during a behavioural task that required rapid, repetitive shifts in visual spatial attention. This analysis revealed a transient increase in phase-locked amplitude, in the interval 0-300ms post-stimulus, contralateral to the visual hemifield in which an attended target appeared. The magnitude of this increase varied with the length of the interval since the previous shift. In addition, by about 600ms post-stimulus, phase-locked amplitude increased in the hemisphere contralateral to the newly attended visual hemifield and decreased in the ipsilateral hemisphere. In the case of long inter-target intervals, phase-locked amplitude increased in the right hemisphere regardless of the laterality of the target. Non-phase-locked amplitude exhibited a complementary pattern of modulation: it decreased contralaterally to the newly attended visual hemifield and increased ipsilaterally. These components may be electrophysiological concomitants of both transient and long-lasting alterations in neural function that implement shifts in visual spatial attention. In particular, we suggest that they may reflect orienting to a target stimulus, and reorienting to a cued location.


To receive a password that will allow you to download a reprint, enter your email address here:


DOWNLOAD REPRINT (requires password)


CITED IN PUBLICATIONS BY OTHERS:

  1. Burkitt GR, Silberstein RB, Cadusch PJ, Wood AW. Steady-state visual evoked potentials and travelling waves. Clinical Neurophysiology 111(2):246-258 (February 2000).
  2. Seiple W, Clemens C, Greenstein VC, Holopigian K, Zhang X. The spatial distribution of selective attention assessed using the multifocal visual evoked potential. Vision Research 42(12):1513-1521 (June 2002).
  3. Keil A, Gruber T, Müller MM, Moratti S, Stolarova M, Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Early modulation of visual perception by emotional arousal: evidence from steady-state visual evoked brain potentials. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 3(3):195-206 (September 2003).
  4. Seiple W, Holopigian K, Clemens C, Greenstein VC, Hood DC. The multifocal visual evoked potential: An objective measure of visual fields? Vision Research 45(9):1155-1163 (April 2005).
  5. Keil A, Ihssen N, Heim S. Early cortical facilitation for emotionally arousing targets during the attentional blink. BMC Biology 4:23 (20 July 2006).
  6. Pastor MA, Thut G, Pascual-Leone A. Modulation of steady-state auditory evoked potentials by cerebellar rTMS. Experimental Brain Research 175(4):702-709 (November 2006).
  7. Cosmelli D. Attending to the stream of consciousness - a methodological challenge. In: From Attention to Goal-Directed Behavior: Neurodynamical, Methodological and Clinical Trends (Aboitiz F & Cosmelli D, eds.), pp 83-103. New York: Springer (16 December 2008, c2009).
  8. Toffanin P, de Jong R, Johnson A, Martens S. Using frequency tagging to quantify attentional deployment in a visual divided attention task. International Journal of Psychophysiology 72(3):289-298 (June 2009).
  9. Keil A, Heim S. Prolonged reduction of electrocortical activity predicts correct performance during rapid serial visual processing. Psychophysiology 46(4):718-725 (July 2009).
  10. Pierce K, Conant D, Hazin R, Stoner R, Desmond J. Preference for geometric patterns early in life as a risk factor for autism. Archives of General Psychiatry 68(1):101-109 (January 2011).
  11. Kim YJ, Grabowecky M, Paller KA, Suzuki S. Differential roles of frequency-following and frequency-doubling visual responses revealed by evoked neural harmonics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(8):1875-1886 (August 2011).
  12. Kashiwase Y, Matsumiya K, Kuriki I, Shioiri S. Time courses of attentional modulation in neural amplification and synchronization measured with steady-state visual-evoked potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24(8):1779-1793 (August 2012).

CITED IN MY OTHER PUBLICATIONS:

  1. Belmonte MK, Yurgelun-Todd DA. Anatomic dissociation of selective and suppressive processes in visual attention. NeuroImage 19(1):180-189 (May 2003).
  2. Belmonte MK, Yurgelun-Todd DA. Functional anatomy of impaired selective attention and compensatory processing in autism. Cognitive Brain Research 17(3):651-664 (October 2003).